buffie body 2009

buffie body 2009. Buffie The Body#39;s Tell All:
  • Buffie The Body#39;s Tell All:



  • charlituna
    May 2, 10:33 PM
    TO ALL FANBOYS:

    This is better than what we have now.
    Life goes on. Live moves forward. Apple is a forward-thinking company.

    Deal with it!

    The best part is that it is an option. You don't have to use this or Launchpad if you don't want to. The whole Finder thing is still there for all the geeks and such





    buffie body 2009. uffie body 2009.
  • uffie body 2009.



  • skiltrip
    Sep 23, 09:54 AM
    Glad you're getting one!! It fits really well and won't slip out compared to the silicone case. I don't understand why Belkin can't make some normal colors, though. The bright colors look nice, but I would NOT want to be seen around with it under certain occasions. ;)

    Do you feel the same about the Night Sky color, or is it more the Aquamarine and Fuscia and neon blinding green? The Night Sky one looks pretty cool. I have no problem with purple colors as long as they are dark, which the Night Sky seems to be from pictures.





    buffie body 2009. uffie body 2009. uffie ody
  • uffie body 2009. uffie ody



  • rovex
    Apr 19, 11:31 AM
    Finally! An iMac rumor!!!!

    desktops are slowly but surely dying out. Notebooks are becoming more and more powerful and even moreso portable so what will an iMac offer that MacBooks won't have? Larger screen?





    buffie body 2009. uffie body 2009. uffie ody
  • uffie body 2009. uffie ody



  • Mlrollin91
    Mar 25, 04:14 PM
    iPad 1 does support HDMI out, just not the video mirroring. This means that an app must support the standard "video out" mechanism to be used with the HDMI adapter with iPad 1.

    What I would like to see is this same thing using AirPlay :)

    I knew it didnt support mirroring but thats my bad. I have an iPad 2, but i was told at Apple the hdmi cable won't work with iPad 1. Guess they should read up a little bit.





    buffie body 2009. Buffie The Body To Release
  • Buffie The Body To Release



  • TangoCharlie
    Aug 25, 06:17 AM
    Um, the Mini does have four USB-ports, and a FireWire-port.

    OOps, you're quite right!!
    http://images.apple.com/uk/macmini/images/indexports20060229.jpg
    http://images.apple.com/uk/macmini/images/indexports20060229.jpg

    :o





    buffie body 2009. Buffie the Body Reality
  • Buffie the Body Reality



  • razzmatazz
    Aug 6, 09:41 PM
    I became a hard core Mac user after Panther was released. I was wondering if Apple took stabs at Microsoft when they were introducing Panther. :confused:





    buffie body 2009. uffie body 2009. to meet
  • uffie body 2009. to meet



  • twoodcc
    Mar 28, 12:03 AM
    I just realized that mc68k hasn't had any points since the 14th of March, hope he hasn't gotten in trouble for folding on company machines...

    yeah i noticed that also. i hope he's able to fold again soon

    I have it all back together now and hope to ride it tomorrow, weather permitting. The paint chip didn't look like this, but I love it! The original silver frame and pipes contrast nicely.

    nice!





    buffie body 2009. uffie body 2009.
  • uffie body 2009.



  • Reventon
    Apr 9, 10:13 PM
    I learnt to drive manual on my brother's 1989 Honda CRX. Haven't drove stick in years though, sadly. :o





    buffie body 2009. uffie body 2009. 2010 New Buffy the ody amp; Boss
  • uffie body 2009. 2010 New Buffy the ody amp; Boss



  • YS2003
    Oct 23, 04:32 PM
    If this update is for 15", it does make sense. I think 15" was the first intel Mac, followed by 17" and MB.





    buffie body 2009. uffie 2009-10-10
  • uffie 2009-10-10



  • jgould
    Mar 1, 03:20 PM
    My wife's desk:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=273823&stc=1&d=1299014496
    My current desk:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=273828&stc=1&d=1299014496





    buffie body 2009. uffie body 2009. uffie ody
  • uffie body 2009. uffie ody



  • Mattsasa
    Apr 2, 07:47 PM
    You're deluding yourself.

    yea uh huh sure.

    I want to ask you how many ipad 2s have you seen out in the wild?

    Because I have seen 14, mine, my aunt, my friend, my friend's dad, and 10 in band class.

    and none of them have any of the said issues.

    so in my experience 100% ipad 2s don't have any hardware issue


    let me throw these comments back in here too


    No light bleed, blemishes, dents, or scratches on my new 64GB AT&T or my friend's 64GB Verizon.

    Of the 4 in my family, none of these issues exists. Try again?





    buffie body 2009. Buffie the Body Working In The
  • Buffie the Body Working In The



  • KnightWRX
    Apr 17, 08:31 AM
    double.





    buffie body 2009. uffie body 2009.
  • uffie body 2009.



  • Evangelion
    Jul 20, 11:36 AM
    I have used Linux before, admit that I gave up with linux with Suse 9. The point I was trying to make with the package manager is that its not easy to go out and find something, every time you either have to find a package for your specific distribution or have it "built" for your distro. If you look at the way the mac works now I can drag the aduim icon to a remote drive, and from almost any machine that meets the basic specs I can then double click that app, even if its on a network drive, it will run, can you say the same for Linux?

    Yes I can. Like I said, I just fire up the package-manager, find the app in question and click "Install". That really is all there is to it. No need to browse the web, looking for installers to download.

    By unification I meant giving a constant user experience with singal points of administration, management ect. Some of my previous sessions with linux the applications did not always fully adhere to guidelines that were set out by KDE, whatever theme i choose, it didnt adapt to it for example.

    Things are different these days. You are basing your judgement on SUSE9, which was released three years ago. During that three years, Linux has made HUGE progress. Things are chaning for the better, and they are changing FAST. I would say that Linux has changed more during the last three years than it did during the five years before 2003.

    Note: that is NOT a bad thing for Apple. I bet that Apple would much rather co-exists with Linux than with Windows. There could never be a monopoly Linux could exploit to harm competitors, Microsoft could do that, and they have done it. Linux is open and follows established standards, Microsoft does not, if they can get away with it. Linux has no interest in destroying competitors, Microsoft does.

    I fully admit im not a linux guru, and that things very likely have changed, but my perception is that every distro comes with a boat load of software on the DVD or via download, if you want to get something thats not listed it becomes a bit more difficult.

    Well, SUSE does ship with tons of apps on the DVD (mainly so that it could be used wby people without broadband). But if you look at Ubuntu for example, it ships with relatively few apps. In a way, they have selected "best of breed"-apps for their distro. But if the user wants to have some additional piece of software, he can just fire up the package-manager, where he can choose from 16.000 pieces of software. The app the user is looking for is most likely listed there. If he's installing a piece of commercial software, they usually ship with nice installers that are not one bit harder to use than the ones in OS X or Windows.

    There is the issue of building your own kernel

    You have no need to do that. Seriously. I haven't built my own kernels in years. And when I did, it was because I wanted to do it, not because I had to do it.

    Just because you CAN compile your own kernel does not mean that you are required to do so. The possibility is there for power-users.

    The mac advantage is that its a bit easier to get, install and run applications than windows, and IMO linux as well.

    I disagree. In Linux all the apps I could even want were just few mouse-clicks away. On OS X (and on Windows) I have to hunt for those apps in internet, only to find out that I'm expected to pay for them. I had none of those problems in Linux.

    why is there a few big distros out there after years of linux development, why are there so many niche ones, and why do linux users argue with others over their favorite distro?

    There are several distros, because one distro can't do it all. Want an OS that can be tweaked and customized to your exact needs and for your specific hardware? Obviously Ubuntu is not ideal then, but Gentoo is. Want a distro that "just works"? Ubuntu would be a good choice then. Want a distro with rock-solid reliablity? Try Debian. Want to run Red Hat servers, but don't want to pay for support? Use CentOS.

    All those distros exist because there are users who find them to be better for their needs than the other distros are. And there's nothing wrong with that, since one size does not fit all. No-one could tell the users that "from now on, there will be just one distro". And even if someone could say that, the users who were unhappy with the "one true distro" could start their own distro if they wanted to.

    Why do users argue which distro is best? For the same reason why Mac-users tell Linux and Windows-users that OS X is the best? For the same reason why BMW-drivers tell others that BMW is better than Merc is? People like to rationalise their choice of OS.

    Diversity and flexability is one of the strenghts of Linux, its users know that, and having a single distro that does everything will counter that strength, they also know that.

    They know that there can't be one distro that "does everything". Ubuntu wants to be easy to use OS that just works. Gentoo wnts to be as customizable, flexible and powerful as possible. It would be very, very hard for single OS to offer both of those ideoogies in one package. It would en up being "jack of all trades, master of none".

    Take Mandrake (Mandiva these days) and Red Hat for example. Years ago Red Hat decided to use GNOME as their default desktop. There were bunch of Red Hat users who liked the distro, but liked KDE more than GNOME. So they took Red Hat, replaced GNOME with KDE and voila: Mandrake was born. From that point te two started to diverge. as independted OS'es.





    buffie body 2009. Buffie the Body. 7.06.2009
  • Buffie the Body. 7.06.2009



  • alongezong
    Apr 3, 04:00 AM
    Advertising we can enjoy. Simple, effective, and clean.

    Apple seems to do just about everything right, including their advertising.

    Jobs for Prez?





    buffie body 2009. uffie body 2009.
  • uffie body 2009.



  • kelving525
    Sep 18, 09:46 PM
    Is that an actual Belkin Silicon case ?

    Nope, it's those 99 cents silicone case from HK!





    buffie body 2009. uffie body 2009.
  • uffie body 2009.



  • jxyama
    Mar 19, 11:11 AM
    You take the low end model, subtract the cost for the monitor and you have a computer that is sitting in the $500.00 - $600.00 range. Many people already have monitors and if not, you can find a decent one for relatively low cost.

    since CRT monitors cost next to nothing these days, eMac price can't be lowered that much even if it was headless. that will just eat into the profits. and why give the money for the monitor to other companies?

    apparently, apple's marketing dept. has concluded that the sale of AIO units with bigger margin turns more profit than that can be expected from increased sale of headless units with smaller margin. and as long as apple's profitable, there's no reason to argue that their strategy is wrong...

    eMac and iMac are for people who want to take home a box, open it up, plug in the power and start using them. they are NOT meant for people who want the absolute cheapest computers. right now, apple is not interested in making that kind of "cheapest" computers... nor has they ever been. the only time that happened was when they allowed clones and that certainly went nowhere because Macs were suddenly a commodity and apple took a major hit as "premium" hardware company.

    mind you, apple could change their mind and offer such a headless machine in the future, if their dept. sees that the computer market is changing. so while you may well be 100% correct in principle, apple hasn't had to or is yet to find a reason to offer such a headless.





    buffie body 2009. uffie the ody videos
  • uffie the ody videos



  • techluvr
    Jan 31, 03:44 PM
    2008 Honda Civic Si

    Most Civics look horrible. That one looks awesome.





    buffie body 2009. uffie body 2009. ody scrubs
  • uffie body 2009. ody scrubs



  • SamEllens
    Apr 12, 09:14 PM
    Does anyone else think there will also be an update to QT X as well? Probably one of the most useless tools on the Mac right now. QTPro is still more useful for work. Just the idea that the buttons cover up the picture at all makes QTX pretty useless. I hope to see a real QTPro X. Bring back the FRAME counter (not just time) and get those controls OFF the picture!!!

    YES! Frame counter AND source TC! I still use QT Pro for everything.





    buffie body 2009. Buffie The Body
  • Buffie The Body



  • LethalWolfe
    Apr 13, 01:10 AM
    This is so that each eye receives 24fps for 3d. So finally 3d will now look like a 3d "movie" rather than a 3d flip book.
    Each eye already receives 24fps (for both 2D and 3D) but the 48fps will make the motion look less choppy and less blurry. The differences can be seen in both 2D and 3D but 3D should be more comfortable to watch at the higher frame rate (especially for long periods of time).


    Lethal





    mKTank
    Nov 30, 12:04 PM
    The only thing that bugs me, is that I quite believe that iOS fakes cell reception. For example, having a FULL 3G signal could be anywhere from 500k-2mbps, where my old phone, aircard, others peoples phones, show 1-2 bars, maybe 3. I get the same speeds with it as I do with my aircard in particular places, but the iPhone shows a stronger signal?

    So while it appears to have better reception, I don't think it actually does.

    That said, I've never dropped a call. It's definitely no worse than any other device, I just don't think it reports accurately.

    Pre-Antennagate it used to fake the signal a lot.

    But as of current firmware, it's probably one of the most honest indicators out there.

    The iPhone 4's antenna does provide stronger signals than most other phones. It just drops the signal when held a certain way, but generally it gives a stronger signal than other antennas.





    (marc)
    Apr 3, 07:04 AM
    Ugh.





    Amazing Iceman
    Apr 21, 01:45 PM
    I trust Apple a lot more than Al Franken.

    Remember, Al Franken voted for legislation that would require, among other privacy violations:
    - All your health care information be reported to the government.
    - All your health care information be kept in a centrallized location.
    - the disclosure of your financial and health care information to the IRS without your notification
    - all busiensses that gather any information about you via the internet (including Apple) to disclose this information to the government upon demand and without a warrant.

    So, Franken can pretend like he cares about privacy, but he's already clearly on the record in thinking that you don't have any privacy when HE wants to find out things about you.

    LOL, and know he's trying to be the #1 Defender of Public Privacy?

    This definitely sounds as a publicity stunt, trying to increase his popularity. Maybe he wants to run for a higher position in the government, perhaps for the Presidency?

    In the end, loosing your iPhone is as bad as loosing your wallet with all your documents, unless you turn on password protection on your iPhone, something you can't do on your wallet.





    Spyriadon
    Apr 19, 12:10 PM
    Wow....a MAC rumor.
    My money is sat here waiting to be spent.
    Next week looks good to me =].





    bwintx
    Jul 20, 06:58 AM
    I bet that Vista will run on several year old machines. You might not get all the bells and whistles, but I don't have all the bells and whistles of Tiger on this Mac Mini of mine either. And since just about all OEM's wil preload Vista on their machines, the sales-numbers will be HUGE. And then we have those who upgrade their existing machines.

    You are correct. Existing PCs will run Vista but without the Aqua-ripoff pretty interface. For the Aqua-ripoff (I refuse to call it anything else), that's where much more RAM and newer video cards come into play by necessity. So, essentially, you get two classes of Vista users (imagine having to write the "requirements" text for Windows software in the near-future; ugh), and a giant opportunity for the memory and video card companies, which are probably buying their magazine and Web banner ad space right now -- not that anybody should alert the media for such info.



    Total Pageviews